Ten Things I Dislike in the World of Gymnastics
I wrote about my distaste for tank leos, gym shoes & the leg-up full turn a few months ago. The list has now expanded. These are the top 10 things I dislike right now in the world of gymnastics.
- The jump-up mount on Beam. Think Shawn Johnson & Li Shanshan. I did this mount as a Level 7 compulsory gymnast way back when. This is an ugly and uncreative mount and way too many gymnasts use it. It is possible to get on the Beam without risk but still with beauty and originality. Using this mount seems lazy and I expect more from world class athletes.
- I’ve said it before but I must say it again. The leotards worn by the United States Women. Now that we’ve seen that the floor and matting is going to be red at the Olympics next year, I hope they come up with something more interesting than this.
- The inconsistency of USA Men’s team. I was thrilled with their 4th place finish in Stuttgart, thinking that all the doubt of the last year was for naught. The 2006 World Championships 13th-place finish was just a complete fluke that we could chalk up to inexperience and an off-day… But then they had to go and finish 8th at the Test Event. What’s the deal? Should I be worried?
- The Side Somi on Beam. I understand the difficulty of it. I attempted aerial cartwheels on Beam for about a day. I know that they are tough. But they are just so ugly.
- The criticism after the last World Championships of athletes who cried after poor performances (Sacramone after the Floor finals, Li Shanshan after Beam Finals). I completely agree that poor sportsmanship should not be tolerated and that Sacramone carried on for far too long…. but I don’t think it should be considered poor form to shed a tear (or be emotional in another way) after botching one of the biggest routines of your life.
- Event Specialists. I know that this is the direction our sport is going these days and there is nothing I can do about it…but I don’t like it. When I was younger and I would tell people that I was a gymnast, they would say things like “Wow, what events do you like the best?” Or “I can’t believe you do the Beam. That must be so hard!” It was understood that I worked on all of the events. Nowadays, when someone hears that I used to be a gymnast, the question is always “Oh really? What events did you do?” Has anyone else noticed this shift in the general population’s perception of our sport? The Test Event going on right now in Beijing couldn’t host a Men’s All Around competition because there weren’t enough All Arounders! That is outrageous.
- Speaking of Event Specialists, Cheng Fei’s recent announcement that she will no longer train bars. You know my thoughts on this subject.
- Lack of choreography on Beam. The athlete’s are trying to get so many skills in these days that there is no time for anything else. It’s getting ridiculous. Case in point: Catalina Ponor’s routine at the World Championships this year. She was moving so fast, basically just throwing her arms around while she set up for each skill. And she still went overtime. Why even bother? Why not just jump up on the Beam and throw your ten hardest skills? That’s all that seems to matter with this code.
- Speaking of choreography, what happened to all the good floor routines? There is no excuse for all the lackluster floor performances these days. Watch an NCAA competition if you don’t think it’s possible to perform hard routines with incredible choreography and dance. A few notable exceptions: Aisha Gerber of Canada, Hollie Dykes & Dasha Joura of Australia, Ivana Hong of the USA, to name a few.
- And finally, I dislike the new scoring system. I know that I’ve harped on it a lot but I miss the perfect 10. It’s been a couple years without it but I still miss it.
What about the rest of you? Anything you currently dislike in the world of gymnastics?






November 30th, 2007 at 7:30 pm
i agree on everything you said completely.
November 30th, 2007 at 8:14 pm
I miss the Perfect 10 scoring system too. But you must admit the “Fink Code” as many call it has been less disastrous than expected. It’s only reduced artistry, made choreography irrelevant, decreased the number of all-arounders, junked-up beam with 10 value parts, …
Oh — maybe it HAS been as disastrous for you as expected.
Me, I’m past the old school insistence of all-around. (It’s easier to get your head around it on the Men’s side where training 6 events, new code, is nearly impossible.)
Specialization I quite like now. More athletes can do the sport. And have longer careers.
November 30th, 2007 at 11:30 pm
Rick,
Part of me knows that you are right about the event specialist. Heck, I was so bad on bars as an athlete that I would probably be one myself if I was still competing! I can definitely see the positive side of it.
But I still miss the solid All Arounder. It’s incredible to find someone who can master them all, like Sherbo in 1992.
December 1st, 2007 at 12:42 am
The low number of gymnastics clubs in one area, leading to less competition, and some gyms taking advantage of that for the worse of the sport and gymnastics experience.
Unexperienced and uneducated coaches coaching as one of the main coaches or even as the main coach.
December 2nd, 2007 at 7:32 am
I also just wanted to say about choreographed floor routines. Nastia Liukin of the USA and Marie-Sophie Hindermann of Germany have amazing floor routines, they are great at showing how we can make this new (horrible) code look good.
December 2nd, 2007 at 9:08 pm
I agree with you on the choreography on beams and floor. I think up to 2004, most floor exercise were done pretty well with good choreography. One of my most favorite floor exercise Yang Yun’s floor and beam from 2000 and Svetlana’s floor in 1996. I used to be into gymnastics, but now I don’t care as much, mainly because of the upheaval in the scoring system, no more 10s.
December 3rd, 2007 at 4:44 pm
the problem with the awful floor choreography epidemic is the 5 tumbling passes. what’s the point of asking shawn johnson and her full in/full out to throw a random double full in the middle of the routine? did endurance become a requirement in the code of points and i missed it? if i wanted to watch a minute thirty of just flipping, i would get into tramp and tumbling. and if i wanted to watch double fulls i would stop by any gym in the country for level 8/9 practice.
i must say though, watching bars recently has been a treat. tons of interesting combinations and releases being thrown. love semenova’s deltchev and i worship every second of nastia’s bars. event finals at worlds had some great stuff going on. euro champs and the olympics should be wonderful to watch (it helps to pretend they’re giving 9.65s instead of 15.8s)
December 6th, 2007 at 2:58 am
I also dislike the jump-mount! But I actually do like the USA leos; I’m a fan of minimalist style and shiny things. There were some really beautiful leos at US nationals this year so I think, overall, the style just gets better.
December 6th, 2007 at 9:41 pm
I agree with you on all of those points. I’d also like to add that I miss compulsories and I miss the top 3 gymnasts per country and top 36 athletes qualifying into the all-around.
To be fair to the US men, they only sent two out of the six members of the 2007 Worlds to the test event. And they didn’t send either of the Hamm twins, who are going for the 2008 Olympics. Except for China and Japan, the other teams sent their A-teams while the US, China, and Japan sent their B-teams.
December 6th, 2007 at 10:43 pm
I tend to agree with everything you said. But in some specialist’s case having the option to specialize has been great for their career. I wonder what Atler’s career might have been like if she just got a pass on bars?
December 9th, 2007 at 5:23 pm
I can’t understand why the tuck jump mount is so popular on beam. There are so many different ways to get on the beam that would look so much nicer. Examples would be some type of leap, a split mount, a press handstand or just a handstand, even a wolf jump would look better.
I think Shawn should go for a front bounder (McCool) mount. That would look really good on her.
December 23rd, 2007 at 11:50 am
I don’t think there’s a change in that more people are event specialist, in my gym you’ll get kicked out if we refuse to ddo an event.
December 23rd, 2007 at 8:17 pm
I’m old school - I’m sitting here watching my old 1992 Olympics gymnastics tapes. I miss the perfect 10, compulsories, and all-around athletes! I sooo wish we could go back to these days.
December 25th, 2007 at 11:03 pm
really, the tuck jump mount is appalling. i agree wiht Alice, there are many risk free mounts which do the job, Shawn and Cheng Fei have a look at Hollie Dykes’ front walkover mount and Lauren Mitchell’s new half turn straddle mount. Although it doesn’t make people go wow, it does mean a bad impression is not left at the beginning before any important skills are done. ‘mental deductions’ are really unecessary. Merry Christmas all
December 25th, 2007 at 11:06 pm
hey guys again,
with floor routines, there are quite a few that are ok in my opinion
1. Sandra Izbasa 2006 routine, I think her choreography was ok; it fit the music well and it wasn’t boring- although her incredible tumbling did compensate. And although the Chinese floor routines are obviously expressive with the arm’ hand movement, they are pretty much the same, all have exactly the same style
January 18th, 2008 at 11:20 am
I definitely agree about the ugliness of side somis on beam, and while I’ve always loved event finals the most, I really miss strong all-around competitions. As for the “jump-up mount on Beam,” I have to say that I’m sorry to hear so many negative comments. It’s not that I disagree with you at all–but I’m a beginning gymnast at age 30 & I can do that mount–it was a great confidence booster for me when I saw Shawn perform it at Nationals. It’s a little disappointing to hear it condemned and have my little bubble of having an elite-level trick burst!
March 7th, 2008 at 3:23 pm
Hey everyone about the event specialist thing, I really don’t like it either. But I do agree that it does benefit those who are trying to have longer careers. HOWEVER, I completely DO NOT agree with this:
JO gymnastics has now introduced the idea of having an “event specialist” nationals competition. So the point is, that if you know your not going to make it to nationals at regionals for AA than you can enter into the “event specialist” nationals… interesting isn’t it
April 17th, 2008 at 3:27 pm
I also dislike the side somi on beam. so not pretty to watch
give me a nice fluid aerial cartwheel any day